BBIO
Published on 05/11/2026 at 11:09 am EDT
Effect of Acoramidis on Improvement or Maintenance of Heart Failure-Related Health Status as Assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) Score in ATTRibute-CM
Charles F. Sherrod,1,2 John A. Spertus,1,2 Marianna Fontana,3 Joshua D. Mitchell,4 James M. Tauras,5 Heather Falvey,6 Chris Chen,6 Jean-François Tamby,6 Jonathan C. Fox,6 Suresh Siddhanti,6 Francesco Cappelli,7 Mazen Hanna,8 and Brett W. Sperry1,2
1Healthcare Institute for Innovations in Quality, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA; 2Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO, USA; 3National Amyloidosis Centre, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK; 4Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA;
5Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA; 6BridgeBio Pharma, Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA; 7Tuscan Regional Amyloidosis Centre, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy; 8Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
CONCLUSIONS
To integrate survival and heart failure-related health status, as assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) score, into a single analysis to describe the efficacy of acoramidis on outcomes in participants from the ATTRibute-CM study (NCT03860935)
PURPOSE
BACKGROUND
RESULTS
Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is characterized by worsening heart failure, leading to impaired quality of life, hospitalizations, and often death1,2
A primary goal in managing ATTR-CM is to slow disease progression to preserve or improve patients' symptoms, function, and quality of life
The KCCQ measures a patient's perspective of their heart failure-related health status3
Acoramidis, an oral transthyretin (TTR) stabilizer that achieves near-complete (≥ 90%) TTR stabilization, is approved in the USA,
Baseline demographics and characteristics were generally well balanced between the treatment groups (Table 2) TABLE 2: Baseline Demographics and Characteristics; mITT Population (N = 611)
Alive and Well
At Month 30, more acoramidis recipients were 'alive and well' than placebo recipients (difference: 14.4%; Figure 2)
Age, years, mean (SD)
Acoramidis (n = 409)
Placebo (n = 202)
77.3 (6.5)
77.0 (6.7)
Sex, male, n (%)
374 (91.4)
181 (89.6)
Wild-type ATTR-CM,a n (%)
370 (90.5)
182 (90.1)
NYHA functional class, n (%)
I
51 (12.5)
17 (8.4)
II
288 (70.4)
156 (77.2)
III
70 (17.1)
29 (14.4)
6MWD,b m, mean (SD)
362.8 (103.5)
351.5 (93.8)
NT-proBNP, pg/mL, median (Q1-Q3)
2273 (1315-3872)
2274 (1128-3590)
Serum TTR,c mg/dL, mean (SD)
23.0 (5.6)
23.6 (6.1)
KCCQ-OS score,d mean (SD)
71.7 (19.4)
70.5 (20.7)
OR = 1.9 (95% CI: 1.3-2.8)
the European Union, Japan, the UK, and Switzerland for the treatment of adults with ATTR-CM4-9
In the phase 3 ATTRibute-CM study, acoramidis demonstrated a favourable trend toward reduced all-cause mortality (ACM) through Month 30 compared with placebo10,11
Acoramidis also significantly attenuated the decline in KCCQ-OS score through Month 30 (least-squares mean difference: 9.9 points; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.0-13.9; p< 0.001), 10 and a higher proportion of participants experienced an improvement in KCCQ-OS score (net increase from baseline) with acoramidis (31%) than with placebo (18%)
METHODS
Because the analysis of KCCQ-OS score at Month 30 can only be assessed in survivors, an approach integrating death and KCCQ-OS score is needed to better characterize the overall treatment benefit and support clinical decision-making
The ATTRibute-CM study design has been described previously10
- Briefly, eligible adult participants (≤ 90 years old) were randomized 2:1 to receive acoramidis HCl 800 mg or placebo
aTTR genotype was reported at randomization. bAcoramidis, n = 407. cAcoramidis, n = 406; placebo, n = 199. dAcoramidis, n = 408.
Alive and Not Worse
60
40
20
0
Alive and Better
NNT = 7 (95% CI: 4.5-16.2)
n = 59
n = 168
p = 0.001
KCCQ-OS > 60 and < 10-point decrease
twice daily for 30 months; concomitant tafamidis use was permitted after Month 12 at the discretion of the investigator
Efficacy analyses were conducted in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population, defined as all randomized participants who received at least one dose of acoramidis or placebo, had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment, and had a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2
To integrate survival and health status into a single analysis, at Month 30 the effect of acoramidis on KCCQ-OS score was
At Month 30, the proportion of participants who were 'alive and not worse' significantly favoured acoramidis versus placebo
(difference: 16.8% using a cut-off of < 5-point decrease; 14.1% using a cut-off of < 10-point decrease; Figure 1)
OR = 1.8 (95% CI: 1.3-2.6)
At Month 30, the proportion of participants who were 'alive and better' significantly favoured acoramidis versus placebo
(difference: 11.5% using a cut-off of > 5-point increase; 7.3% using a moderate > 10-point improvement cut-off; Figure 3)
compared with placebo as participants 'alive and not worse', those 'alive and well', and those 'alive and better' (Table 1) using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with stratification factors of TTR genotype (wild-type versus variant), N-terminal pro-B-type
natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration, and eGFR; numbers needed to treat (NNTs) with 95% CIs were calculated as 60
the inverse of the absolute risk reductions and their 95% CIs, using the Mantel-Haenszel method
Participants with a missing change from baseline value for KCCQ-OS score who were alive at Month 30 were excluded from
the analysis. Participants who experienced ACM by Month 30 were also excluded 40
Outcome
Definition
Alive and not worse (two thresholds examined)
Alive and a decrease from baseline in KCCQ-OS score of either < 5 or < 10 points
Alive and well
Alive and KCCQ-OS score of > 60 with a decrease from baseline of < 10 points
Alive and better (two thresholds examined)
Alive and an increase from baseline in KCCQ-OS score of either > 5 or > 10 points
20
0
Limitations: KCCQ-OS scores were analysed only for participants who survived to Month 30, which may have skewed the analyses
OR = 2.1 (95% CI: 1.4-3.1)
p < 0.001
Placebo
n = 56
n = 73
n = 171
n = 194
NNT = 6 (95% CI: 4.0-11.6)
< 5-point decrease
NNT = 8 (95% CI: 4.5-18.3)
p = 0.002
< 10-point decrease
Placebo
OR = 2.1 (95% CI: 1.3-3.4)
NNT = 9 (95% CI: 5.5-20.4)
p = 0.002
OR = 2.0 (95% CI: 1.1-3.6)
NNT = 14 (95% CI: 7.8-53.4)
p = 0.016
n = 16
n = 26
n = 58
n = 93
40
20
0
5-point increase
10-point increase
towards those with better health status
CORRESPONDING AND PRESENTING AUTHOR: Charles F. Sherrod, [email protected]
REFERENCES: 1. Eldhagen P, et al. ESC Heart Failure. 2023;10(3):1871-1882. 2. Ruberg F, Maurer MS. JAMA. 2024;331(9):778-791. 3. Green CP, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35(5):1245-1255. 4. Judge DP, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(3):285-295. 5. BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. Prescribing Information, Attruby (acoramidis). FDA, 2024. Accessed 13 March 2026. www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/ label/2024/216540s000lbl.pdf. 6. BridgeBio Europe B.V. SmPC, Beyonttra (acoramidis). EMA, 2025. Accessed 13 March 2026. www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/beyonttra-epar-product-information_en.pdf. 7. Alexion. SmPC, Beyonttra (acoramidis). MHLW Japan, 2025. Accessed 13 March 2026. www.pmda.go.jp/PmdaSearch/iyakuDetail/ResultDataSetPDF/870056_2190048F1029_1_01.
8. Bayer (Switzerland) AG. Approval summary, Beyonttra (acoramidis). Swissmedic, 2025. Accessed 13 March 2026. www.swissmedic.ch/swissmedic/en/home/humanarzneimittel/authorisations/new-medicines/beyonttra-filmtabletten-acoramidisum.html. 9. Bayer plc. SmPC, Beyonttra (acoramidis). MHRA UK, 2025. Accessed 1 April 2026. https://mhraproducts4853.blob.core.windows.net/ docs/65cdc303a1411fa20142875b65739fad8ac72058. 10. Gillmore JD, et al. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(2):132-142. 11. Judge DP, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025;85(10):1003-1014.
FUNDING: This study was sponsored by BridgeBio Pharma, Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA.
ABBREVIATIONS: 6MWD, 6-minute walk distance; ACM, all-cause mortality; ATTR-CM, transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy; CI, confidence interval; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; KCCQ-OS, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary; mITT, modified intention-to-treat; NNT, number needed to treat; NT-proBNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; NYHA, New York Heart Association; OR, odds ratio; Q1, first quartile; Q3, third quartile; SD, standard deviation; TTR, transthyretin.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Under the direction of the authors, medical writing assistance was provided by Anson Shek, PhD, of Oxford PharmaGenesis and was funded by BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. Editorial support and critical review were provided by Dana Walters, PhD, and Shweta Rane, PhD, CMPP, BCMAS, of BridgeBio Pharma, Inc.
Disclaimer
BridgeBio Pharma Inc. published this content on May 09, 2026, and is solely responsible for the information contained herein. Distributed via Public Technologies (PUBT), unedited and unaltered, on May 11, 2026 at 15:08 UTC.