ARWR
Published on 05/18/2025 at 20:06
Timothy N. Perkins, PhD1*, David I Kasahara, PhD2, Taylor Reed2, Holly Hamilton, PhD2, James Hamilton, MD2, MD, Tim D. Oury, MD, PhD1, Erik W. Bush, PhD2
1Deptartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine. Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 2Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Madison, WI, USA. *Corresponding author.
RESULTS
Background
RESULTS
Results
Summary
Discussion
Our previous studies have demonstrated that full genetic knockout of RAGE (global) significantly protects mice in several experimental models of asthma
Here we demonstrate that haplodeficiency also partially protects mice several models of T2hi asthma
We have also recently shown that RAGE-deficient mice are protected in a model of severe T2lo asthma. However, studies are needed in additional models to assess the effects of haplodeficiency
Current data suggests that RAGE is a promising target for asthma treatment, however, studies are needed to define the mechanisms by which RAGE promotes airway inflammation and asthma
Future Directions
Determine the effects of RAGE haplodeficiency on airway hyperresponsiveness by FlexiVent analysis
Determine the effects of RAGE haplodeficiency on airway mucus metaplasia and tissue inflammation
Examine which RAGE-expressing cells promote immune responses to allergens (e.g. structural or inflammatory)
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals
Results
RESULTS4
DAMP and PRR
Most abundantly expressed in the lungs
Binds several ligands
Activates an array of signaling
pathways
SNPs are associated with variation in lung function
RAGE+/+
Allergen Exposure
RAGE-/-
HMGB1
IL-33
HMGB1
VCAM1 VCAM1
RAGE-deficient (heterozygous global knockout) mice are protected in several models of T2hi asthma/allergic airway
Endothelium Activation
rIL-33
TH2
ILC2
ILC2 ILC2
Endothelium Activation
rIL-33
TH2
disease (AAD)
RAGE is required at several steps in the pathologic process of T2hi AAD
Here we examine the effects of RAGE haplodeficiency in multiple models of AAD
rIL-4/5/13
IL-4
IL-13
TH2-skewing
AHR
B-cell class switching
Chemokine
Chemokine production
production
Mucus Metaplasia
Mucus Metaplasia
IL-5
Eosinophil Proliferation Activation Recruitment
IL-5 IL-13 IL-4
rIL-4/5/13
Perkins et al. Allergy 2021
Methods
Experimental models of asthma
We utilized three established mouse models of T2hi asthma/ allergic airway disease:
Alternaria alternata
House dust mite (HDM) and
rIL-33
Allergens (Alternaria/HDM) were purchased from Greer Labs and rIL-33 from Biolegend
Animals
Wild-type (C57BL/6NTac), RAGE-Het (+/-) and RAGE-KO (-/-) were used in each experimental model
Inflammation
Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cellular inflammation was determined by total cell counts and differential counts by cytospin analysis
BAL cytokines were measured by multiplex assay (Eve Technologies)
Chronic disease of the airways:
Persistent inflammation
Mucus hypersecretion
Airway hyper-reactivity
Caused by environmental and genetic factors.
Pathologically heterogeneous
Affects ~400 million people worldwide
Nearly 10% of cases are severe
Accounts for 50% of healthcare burden of asthma in the US
Half of severe asthmatics present with "Type 2-high" (T2hi) phenotype
T2hi asthma is driven by type 2 cytokines: Interleukin(IL)-4, IL-5, and IL-13
The mechanisms of T2hi asthma remain incompletely understood
Lambrecht et al. Immunity 2019
A Day 0 3 6 B C
Wild-type (+/+)
9 10
END
i.n. SAL or Alt (25µg)
RAGE-Het (+/-)
Day 0
Challenge
7
RAGE-KO (-/-)
i.n. SAL or HDM (50µg)
14 17 18
END
i.n. SAL or HDM (25µg)
Sensitization
Challenge
D
Figure 1 (A) Experimental design: Wild-type, RAGE-Het and RAGE-KO mice were challenged with models of Alternaria and HDM induced allergic airway inflammation as indicated. (B) BAL Total cells for mice challenged with Alternaria.
(C) BAL Total cells. (D) Eosinophils in mice challenged with HDM. *P<0.05 for
indicated comparison, N=3-6/group.
A
B
C
Wild-type (+/+)
Day 0
1
2 3
RAGE-Het (+/-)
4
END
i.n. SAL or rIL-33 (1µg)
RAGE-KO (-/-)
Challenge
Figure 2 (A) Experimental design: Wild-type, RAGE-Het and RAGE-KO mice were challenged with a model of rIL-33 induced allergic airway inflammation as indicated. (B) BAL Total cells.
(C) BAL Eosinophils. (D) BAL total protein. (E)
BAL sRAGE levels. *P<0.05 for indicated comparison, N=3-6/group.
D
E
A
B
C
Figure 3 BAL type 2 cytokine levels. (A) Interleukin-4 (IL-4),
(B) Interleukin-5 (IL-5) and (C) Interleukin-13 (IL-13) *P<0.05 for indicated comparison, N=3-
6/group.
A
B
C
Figure 4 BAL Monocyte,
macrophage
chemokines.
(A) Monokine-induced by gamma interferon (MIG), (B) Macrophage inflammatory protein-1 (MIP-1) and (C) Macrophage inflammatory protein-1 (MIP-1). *P<0.05 for indicated comparison, N=3-6/group.
A B C
Figure 5.
cytokines.
BAL Th1/Th17
(A)
Tumor
necrosis factor (TNF ),
(B) Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and (C) Interferon gamma induced protein 10 (IP-10)
*P<0.05 for indicated
comparison, N=3-6/group.
Asthma
Inflammation
RAGE expression
RAGE inhibition
Progressive reduction in RAGE expression correspondingly reduces airway inflammation in well established models of asthma
Disclaimer
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals Inc. published this content on May 18, 2025, and is solely responsible for the information contained herein. Distributed via Public Technologies (PUBT), unedited and unaltered, on May 19, 2025 at 00:05 UTC.